Pigs

Improves daily weight gains, enhances meat quality, strengthens native immunity ! Growfeed

Feeding experiment on pigs

  • Performing institution : Gyeongsangbuk-do Livestock Technology Reseach Center
  • Experiment period : May. 16, 2011 ~ Aug. 15, 2011 (90 days)
  • Experiment species : 26 heads of castrated pigs (three-way crossbreed of Landrace and Duroc) and divided into two groups with 13 heads per group
  • Experiment method : Control group (no addition of Growfeed Well Farm to feedstuff)
  • Experimental group (added 0.3% of Growfeed Well Farm to feedstuff)

Changes in the weight and weight gain and daily weight gain during the whole experiment period

  • The total weight gain per head of the experimental group was 29.5kg which was greater than the control group.
  • The daily weight gain per head of the experimental group was 1.03kg while that of the control group was 0.93kg.
  • he weight at the starting age was similar between the two groups but after one month (30 days), the experimental group showed better weights than the control group. At 90 days from the start of the experiment, the weight of the experimental group was about 6kg heavier than that of the control group.
Division Control group Experimental group
Weight per head (kg) Starting age (days)
30
60
90
58.2
90.2
120.5
130.7
57.6
95.0
124.7
136.7
Total weight gain per head (kg) Average 26.9 29.5
Daily weight gain per head (kg) Average 0.93 1.03

Total and daily feed intake per head during the whole experiment period

  • The daily intake per head of the experimental group was 3.38kg which was lower than that of the control group (3.43kg) and the experimental group showed a lower feed conversion rate (3.28) compared to the control group (3.95).
Division Control group Experimental group
Monthly intake per head (kg) Starting age
1~30
31~60
Average
58.2
90.2
120.5
130.7
57.6
95.0
124.7
136.7
Daily intake per head (kg) Starting age
1~30
31~60
Average
-
86.4
95.4
126.9
102.9
-
86.4
90.9
126.9
101.4
Feed conversion rate Starting age
1~30
31~60
Average
-
2.88
3.18
4.23
3.43
-
2.88
3.03
4.23
3.38

Physicochemical changes in the serum

  • The experimental group showed lower total cholesterol levels in the blood than the control group.
  • The experimental group showed greater glucose and lgG contents than the control group.
  • experimental group also showed lower GOT and GPT than the control group indicating better liver functions.
Division T-Cho TG GOT GPT 6LU laG
Control group 112.3 58.25 77.0 42.55 96.2 935.5
Carcass performance 109.4 59.30 69.60 41.05 102.3 977

Carcass performance

  • The experimental group showed a greater carcass weight than the control group and the back-fat thickness of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group.
  • This demonstrates the excellent of Macsumsuk and it appears that the addition of Macsumsuk will greatly contribute to the improvement of the weight gain and meat quality of pork.
Division Control group Experimental group
Carcass weight (kg) 98.80 103.4
Back-fat thickness (mm) 23.2 19.6

Physicochemical and sensory test results of pork

  • The experimental group showed greater heating loss and water-holding capacity than the control group. In particular, the cholesterol content of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group suggesting that the addition of Macsumsuk has positive effects on the muscle and fat characteristics of pork.
Division Control group Experimental group
Heating loss (%)
Shearing force (Kg / 0.5 inch)
Water-holding capacity (%)
35.63
6.19
53.98
33.07
5.53
54.65
Juiciness
Tenderness
Flavor
4.42
3.82
4.40
4.5
3.84
4.54
Cholesterol content (mg / 100g) 42.03 38.15

Fatty acid composition of pork

  • The control group showed greater saturated fatty acid contents than the experimental group, whereas the experimental group showed greater unsaturated fatty acid contents than the control group. It was found that the excessive intake of saturated fatty acid has increased the cholesterol level.
  • Unsaturated fatty acid is effective in the prevention of adult diseases as it reduces the cholesterol in the blood.
Division Control group Experimental group
Saturated fatty acid 38.58 37.77
Unsaturated fatty acid 61.42 62.53
Monounsaturated fatty acid 50.37 50.96
Polyunsaturated fatty acid 11.05 11.57

An experiment on ammonia-absorbing effect in pig shed with Growfeed Clean

An experiment on ammonia-absorbing effect in pig shed with Growfeed Clean

  • Farmer : InGeol Baek
  • Experiment period : Dec. 16, 2012
  • Performing farm : 703, Changha-ri, Gogyeong-myeon, Yeongcheon-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do
  • Experiment subject : Analysis of ammonia-absorbing effect in pig shed with Growfeed Clean
  • Experiment method : Used Growfeed Clean (Anti-ammonia dusting powder) in 2 piggeries
  • Spraying method : Sprayed 180g per sqm in the floor of piggeries
  • Test method : Measured ammonia gas density at the height of pig snou

Ammonia-absorbing effect

Division Area (㎡) Dosage Heads Before spraying 30 min. later 60 min. later 90 min. later Reduction rate (%)
Piggery 130 24 150 38ppm 18ppm 15ppm 11.4ppm 70

Feeding experiment data on pigs with Growfeed E-Tox

Starting date of the trial Apr. 30, 2012
Number of pigs 1,200 heads
Trial period Apr. 30, 2012 ~ Sep. 30, 2012
Dosage of Growfeed E-Tox Added 0.3% to feedstuff

Experiment on feed requirement ratio (0.3% of improvement)

Without Growfeed E-Tox

Shipping date Heads shipped Total weight shipped (kg) Average weight per head (kg) Consumed feed quantity (kg) Feed requirement ratio
2011.10 204 22,700 111.2 349.16 3.14
2011.11 166 18,020 108.5 320.07 2.95
2011.12 123 13,300 108 313.20 2.90
2012.01 124 12,330 99.4 291.24 2.93
2012.02 208 23,530 113 319.79 2.83
2012.03 248 27,065 109 313.92 2.88
2012.04 167 19,100 114.3 323.46 2.83

Added 0.3% of Growfeed E-Tox to feedstuff

Shipping date Heads shipped Total weight shipped (kg) Average weight per head (kg) Consumed feed quantity (kg) Feed requirement ratio
2012.05 210 22,970 109.3 298.38 2.73
2012.06 166 18,280 110 289.30 2.63
2012.07 128 14,120 110.3 284.57 2.58
2012.08 211 22,920 108.6 276.93 2.55
2012.09 251 27,600 110 277.20 2.52